Challenger disaster case study engineering ethics
Decision-makers thought that they understood the risks and that the risks were acceptable. But they were not villainous. For your convenience, we will also email you your Certificate of Completion.
Engineers shall avoid all conduct or practice that deceives the public. To view, print and study the course document, please click on the following link s : Engineering Ethics Case Study: The Challenger Disaster 1.
Direct quotations from engineers interviewed after the disaster are used to illustrate the ambiguities of the data and the pressures that the decision-makers faced in the months and hours preceding the launch.
You may need to download Acrobat Reader to view and print the document. There is no time limit on the quiz, and you can take it multiple times until you pass at no additional cost.
Challenger engineering disaster
The observations and accusations of the Commission and other critics at the time taken together became the standard interpretation of the cause of the Challenger disaster. Engineers may express publicly technical opinions that are founded upon knowledge of the facts and competence in the subject matter. Learning Objective This course teaches the following specific knowledge and skills: Common errors to avoid in studying the history of an engineering failure: the retrospective fallacy and the myth of perfect engineering practice; Shuttle hardware involved in the disaster; Decisions made in the period preceding the launch; Ethical issue: NASA giving first priority to public safety over other concerns; Ethical issue: the contractor giving first priority to public safety over other concerns; Ethical issue: whistle blowing; Ethical issue: ownership of company records; and Ethical issue: how the public perceives that an engineering decision involves an ethical violation. Direct quotations from engineers interviewed after the disaster are used to illustrate the ambiguities of the data and the pressures that the decision-makers faced in the period preceding the launch. Engineers shall at all times strive to serve the public interest b. This database provides real cases brought before the board and the process by which they arrived at a conclusion whether unethical behavior occurred. Professional Obligations 1. A few further considerations on the ethical design and operation of the Space Shuttle: It is believed that the crew of the shuttle survived until impact with the surface of the ocean, and possible that they may have been conscious. To buy the course and take the quiz, please click on:.
Mark P. Engineers shall be guided in all their relations by the highest standards of honesty and integrity.
based on 114 review