In a way, he solves the mystery of how a colony on a distant continent was changed from being under the authority of a monarch to a republic based on a new way of thinking.
Now, strengthened and guided by the developed libertarian natural rights ideology of the eighteenth century, and reacting to aggrandizement of the British imperial state in the economic, constitutional, and religious spheres, the Americans, in escalated and radicalized confrontations with Great Britain, had made and won their Revolution.
They have become the motivations, the standards, and the roots to modern political systems.Therefore the ability of the colonial society to bind one person to the other became so vulnerable to the extent that it would not resist any outside forces to change. It was natural for the colonists to want to advance their social and economic standards to that of the elite. Public or political liberty--or what we now call positive liberty--meant participation in government. He believes the pioneering revolutionaries were rooted in the belief of an American Republic. As it was, all their victories were based on guerrilla-type concepts of revolutionary war, while all the American defeats came from stubborn insistence by such men as Washington on a conventional European type of open military confrontation. Thinkers like these two men were leaders in the Enlightenment age, who would eventually influence not only people all over Europe but those in colonies like America and Saint-Domingue. These voluntary associations according to the author expressed the new desire to meet benevolent goals. The way in which Davis tells her story, readers could be expected to be delighted that Arnaud came into the picture after the departure of Martin. Hence, in Pennsylvania, the radical drive for independence meant that the reluctant oligarchy had to be pushed aside, and the process of that pushing led to the most liberal and most democratic constitution of all the states. The type of approach to the mental world of Bertrande de Rols, the wife who actually collaborated with the imposter Arnaud de Tilh, that Davis offers in her book, Finlay writes, is "radically different" than that of author Jean de Coras' version. What was envisioned as a virtue as far as the republican was concerned was in itself very fragile and doomed to fail by either the forces of nature or though other social parameters such as the demand for equality released by the Revolution.
This was a change from previous republican views on trade. To pursue a career as a doctor or a lawyer in order to make it in life designated low social status. After all page 19"Martin Guerre was impotent," and nothing happened in their bed for "more than eight years" after their wedding.
Wood offers the following outline: According to the classical republican tradition, man was by nature a political being, a citizen who achieved his greatest moral fulfillment by participating in a self-governing republic.
All in all Wood argues that ideas and ideological issues matter in the context of the American historical background. This widening was helped everywhere by the depreciation of the monetary unit and hence of existing property requirements entailed by the inflation that helped finance the war.