Writing a systematic literature review

Identify and retrieve articles for your review by searching electronic databases.

systematic literature review example paper

Hence, good literature reviews are an inevitably needed part of providing the modern scientists with a broad spectrum of knowledge. A literature review a defines a specific issue, concept, theory, phenomena; b compiles published literature on a topic; c summarises critical points of current knowledge about the problem and d suggests next steps in addressing it.

Systematic review example pdf

Therefore, it is no wonder why systematic reviews are gaining popularity among researchers and why journals are moving in this direction as well. Systematic literature review, as the name implies, is the more structured of the two and is thought to be more credible. A comprehensive systematic literature review can often take a team of people up to a year to complete. A quality assessment is commonly used in mediating messages for exclusion or inclusion. Other tools to make search strategy more comprehensive and focused are also truncations — a tool for searching terminologies that have same initial roots e. Studies that were only published in a language other than English. Hence, good literature reviews are an inevitably needed part of providing the modern scientists with a broad spectrum of knowledge.

The main difference between them is situated in the process of collecting and selecting data and the material for the review. They also look into reducing the social reality to a variable in the same manner regarding physical realities.

Systematic literature review qualitative research

Modulate one or more general arguments for organizing the review. Place in the research article: Title, Abstract, Introduction. Example of a structured research question: What are the most important factors associated with the development of PTSD in soldiers? A literature review a defines a specific issue, concept, theory, phenomena; b compiles published literature on a topic; c summarises critical points of current knowledge about the problem and d suggests next steps in addressing it. Some trick to help you do this is to choose two or three main information sources e. If the information is missing in some specific paper, always register it in your reports. How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature. Examples of the instruments available for evaluating the quality of the studies: PEDro, Jadad scale, the lists of Delphi, OTseeker, Maastricht criteria. It is also measuring the amount of research number of papers within the various components of the topic or field. London: SAGE, Specify the search terms that you use in these searches. I suggest that you go through the list of useful resources provided below and hopefully, you can get enough information about anything related that remained unanswered. In short, the main purpose of the systematic review in the quantitative type is to predict, control or explain phenomena using focused analysis of the numerical data. When your review includes quantitative information and the studies in your review are sufficiently similar, you can conduct statistical meta-analysis where you combine the data from the various studies and provide an overall effect size for the phenomenon under investigation.

After you exclude ineligible articles from your review, assess the remaining articles for quality. Pati D 1Lorusso LN 2.

Systematic review guidelines

Furthermore, they include the possibility of evaluating consistency and generalization of the evidence regarding specific scientific questions and are, therefore, also of great practical value within the psychological field. It offers a broader and more accurate level of understanding than a traditional literature review. Researchers also try to control the variable or variables in order to see how it influences the other. In Thorpe, R. Modulate one or more general arguments for organizing the review. The main difference between them is situated in the process of collecting and selecting data and the material for the review. Epub Dec Keep in mind that the quality of the systematic review depends on the validity and the quality of the studies included in the review. SLR provides a way to assess the quality level and magnitude of existing evidence on a question or topic of interest. Systematic literature review, as the name implies, is the more structured of the two and is thought to be more credible. The writer will develop an outline of the literature review to determine areas of similarities and differences that emerge in the reading. This alerts the review team to any potential bias.

Tip: Present the excluded articles as a part of the selection process mentioned in step 3. Besides scientific literature, literature reviews often include the so called gray literature.

Rated 6/10 based on 94 review
Download
How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature.